Prohibited substance or its metabolites or markers, in the sample of an athlete. The athlete is primarily responsible for the presence of any prohibited substance, or its metabolites or markers, that may be found in his body. In such a case, it would not be necessary to show intent, knowing use or negligence to establish an anti-doping rule violation. Inesem business school master in personal training more information 2. Use or attempted use by an athlete of a prohibited substance or prohibited method.
The success or failure of the use or attempted use of a prohibited substance or prohibited method will not exempt the athlete from responsibility for it, and may be sufficient to demonstrate non-compliance with anti-doping regulations. 3. Evade, reject or breach whatsapp number list the obligation refusal or refusal to submit to doping control and, likewise, to the collection of sample(s). 4. Non-compliance related to location or availability when the athlete is not available to carry out out-of-competition controls. As stated in wada's international standard for
testing and investigations (isti) , the combination of 3 failed tests in a 12-month period would constitute an anti-doping rule violation. 5. Tampering or attempted tampering any part of the doping control procedure. The intentional interference, or its intentional attempt, of the alteration of the normal development of doping control through negative conduct on the part of the athlete, as well as through the transmission of fraudulent information. 6. Possession of prohibited substances and prohibited methods. Possession by an athlete or support personnel of any prohibited substance or any prohibited method, unless the athlete establishes possession